Unused image for driving post
Jun. 13th, 2026 05:37 pm


http://buymeacoffee.com/kimberlysteele
Your prayers of blessing to the deity/deities of your choice are welcome whether or not you can donate.
I'm just wrapping up a book project on Renaissance methods of mind training now, and my next nonfiction project is a request from a publisher -- they want a book on practical polytheism, more or less the "practice" book to go alongside my "theory" book, A World Full of Gods. That strikes me as a very worthwhile project. I can think of quite a number of things I'll want to put into it, but I have the best commentariat on the internet and I know that a lot of my readers worship more than one deity.
Trying to restore good habits at my age is tricky. Especially when what I consider to be bad habits are so easy to fall into.
I made the decision to stop buying e-books from those greedy bastards at Amazon due to the simple fact that they don’t let you purchase your book, they sell you a “license” to the right to read the book and appear to be working toward a system where you will only be able to read them on devices approved by them or on a windows application that they control. Simply put, fuck them and the horses they rode in on.
So I am attempting a reversion to my reading habits from the long-ago. I currently have five paper-based books sitting on the table that serves as my desk.
1. Isaac Asimov: Foundation and Empire
2. Mortimer Adler: Aristotle for Everyone
3. Graham Greene: The Quiet American
4. Isaiah Berlin: The Proper Study of Mankind.
5. Samuel P. Huntington: Political Order in Changing Societies
The reading habits I am attempting to revive are based around when I was in school long ago and was taking three or four different courses and had assigned reading in each course (when I first got out of the army and was taking courses in Poli Sci, this was a real deal. I would read a chapter from one course, then take a break and then read a chapter from another course and continue the round until I was caught up.
When I realized that jobs using poli sci are reserved for rich kids from elite schools, I went back, talked my way into grad school, and started taking science courses seriously so the cycling reading had to be dropped because I actually had to understand what I was reading and not just prepare myself to parrot back my better’s opinions. This required long stretches staring at a page, not understanding, then going back to figure out just what I needed that I missed.
So my reading habits are now more complicated. By trying to understand where we are as a society, the best that I can figure, the answers aren’t here on the internet, but probably back in the discarded and ignored warnings of the past. So I am heading (with considerable trepidation) back to an amalgam of prior reading habits. I think that I need to work on the process of melding the lessons learned in the different books by the different perspectives drawn from the different books and create a whole.
But then again, creation of such an amalgam of thought is not what I need to do. I suspect that the ability to have multiple perspectives might well be more important to sanity and understanding that a theory cobbled together from inputs that an inharmonious.

We live in a time of rapid change and uncertainty. The 50 year failure of the environmental movement has left us with a tangle of interconnected problems. Ecosystem destruction; freakishly high levels of pollution of the land the water and the atmosphere; and resource depletion combine to create a looming crisis of epic proportions. We are faced with increasing political and economic instability and it’s clear that there will be no large scale co-ordinated efforts to address any of it.
This blog is about what we can do, as ordinary people in families and small groups, to create lives worth living; to build a future worth having; and to be a force for renewal and regeneration in our much depleted world.
I had planned to move on to taking all the accumulated ideas about systems thinking outside into the neighbourhood to start the process of exploring your home territory. Instead I’m going to take a side trip into some of the ideas generated by the last couple of posts.
In permaculture self-responsibility is the prime directive. The whole idea is that we can take meeting our own needs into our own hands. We can create resilient systems of production that imitate natural systems and have a positive impact on the ecosystem around us.
It’s a DIY approach to getting small scale, sometimes very small scale, micro or even nano-systems, going everywhere. Providing for yourself and your family as much as possible and helping others in your community do the same is the goal.
Human needs are pretty simple: Air, Water, Food, Shelter, Clothing, Education, Entertainment, Health Care, Other People, Heathy ecosystems (which brings us back in a circle to air, water, food …) Yes, you can add layers of complexity getting into the particulars of meaning, status, useful work etc., but these are the big ones.
Productive food systems are the main focus of Permaculture design partly because industrial agriculture is so extravagant in it’s use of resources and so devastating to the ecosystem and partly because of the top three human needs it's the easiest one for people to act on.
Well and good, but if we are looking for where it’s easy to take meeting our needs into our own hands there two others that really stand out: Entertainment and Other People.
Entertainment is certainly the low hanging fruit when it comes to meeting our own needs even without other people. Take a walk.* Get a book from the library. Draw pictures. Write stories. Learn to play an instrument. Sing. Dance. Take up a hobby. Learn a new skill. Pick something and go for it. As Joel Salatin says “Anything worth doing well is worth doing badly first.”
Taking responsibility for providing our own entertainment is also a great way to build up our fragmented and tenuous social connections. Community develops when people need each other. It also develops when people get together to have fun, to eat together, to celebrate and to entertain each other.
Entertainment is one of the things the corporate world is happy, even eager to supply and you have to ask yourself why. Cultural dominance is easier and less expensive than military dominance. Movies, videos, and other forms of industrial entertainment shape our worldviews and our expectations. They inform our thinking.
Some ideas become commonplace, others become outlandish and strange, still others become either literally unthinkable, or so unconventional that they require huge explanations and a lengthy backstory to make them clear.
More than that, corporate entertainment keeps us passive and distracted; amused or frightened; passionate or outraged. It keeps us spinning. It prevents us from focussing on the things that really matter and from pursuing our own goals.
Providing our own entertainment is a revolutionary act. It’s the first step in reclaiming our culture and re-creating our sense of ourselves as part of a unique community in a particular part of the world.
Culture is what people do and how they do it. It’s all the ways and means they have for meeting their basic needs and all the other things they do for pleasure and companionship. Reclaiming culture is doing things.
It’s cooking and eating together.** It’s keeping family traditions alive and creating new ones. It’s the way we decorate bodies and our homes. And, of course it’s all the other ways we express our creativity too.
Story telling, art, music, and dance, have been as critical to human development as using fire and making string,*** or any of our other technological achievements. Like any other element in a complex system all these things have more than one function.
As mentioned above they foster and strengthen social bonds. They are also ways of sharing ideas, our own ideas, when we do it ourselves; remembering our history, our own history, not the version of events that serves the political and economic elite; and providing a strong resilient foundation for our children as they grow up into an unpredictable world fraught with conflict and confusion.
Providing our own entertainment is not a frivolous extra to be considered after we’ve got the important stuff going. It is important stuff. It’s how we free our minds and build up our resistance to the outside influences that distract us, deny us agency, and lead us into helplessness and despair.
Reclaiming culture includes a huge range of activities and possibilities. Building practical skills like cooking and other hobbies; connecting with friends and neighbours, learning to navigate your home territory, and cultivating the awareness of your local ecosystem. All of these are cultural practices.
And yes, the world is full of serious problems. The predicaments we face bite and will continue to bite for a long time to come. Reclaiming our culture won’t change that. But providing our own entertainment; keeping our own sources of information sharing active; and using our creative talents to connect with others and to bring more joy into our lives, is probably the best response we have.
* Don’t just take a walk, take up walking. Walking is active relaxation as opposed to watching a video which is passive stimulation and it has quite a different impact on your nervous system.
** Cooking is always a cultural expression. Decisions about what is or is not food are cultural and have very little to do with actual nutrition. Eating together is a fundamental of shared culture.
*** The string revolution: Elizabeth Wayland Barber, Women's Work: The First 20,000 Years - Women, Cloth, and Society in Early Times (1996) W. W. Norton & Company
When the Pirates of Penzance attack Mabel (Linda Ronstadt) and her sisters, their father, the Major-General, arrives! What is The Pirates of Penzance (1983) about? Frederic (Rex Smith), who has spent his formative years as a junior pirate, plans to mark his 21st birthday by breaking free from the Pirate King (Kevin Kline) and beginning his courtship of Mabel (Linda Ronstadt). But because he was born on Feb. 29, a date that only arrives every fourth year, Frederic isn't technically 21 -- and the Pirate King is still his master. Unless something gives, Frederic will soon be on a collision course with the Pirate King's new nemesis: Mabel's father.Randy didn't include the parts where he rhymes himself into a corner then has to rhyme himself out. That would have been even funnier, but apparently it's only in this movie. The original didn't have those, and it's the original Randy is parodying.

When I was in college a long time ago, whenever I had to buy books,I bought used books. A lot of people will think that this is just because I was cheap. The truth of the matter is that I always went through the stacks of used books to look for the ones that have been marked most extensively.
There were a couple reasons for this, when people used to mark up their books they used to tell you what they thought was important, and I found that the people who spent more time marking up their books got better grades than I did. The fact that they were cheaper was just icing on the cake. And I was cheap, my GI bill didn’t stretch far enough to allow for new books and partying…..I had to make choices.
I have been weaning myself off of e-books except for those on Gutenberg and off-flavor pulp fiction at Baen Books. I suppose that these two repositories well define my reading habits. I read old, meaningful stuff from long ago and utter trash pulp fiction while I enjoy a cocktail and/or an edible. I am not ashamed. But when I want to read a specific book that slides between these two poles, I go to Thriftbooks and buy used.
I just received and started a re-read of Graham Greene’s “The Quiet American” and I am just hitting the parts where the previous owner started marking up the book. I am fairly certain that the former owner was a young person and the book was assigned reading for a college course. What amused me was the notes made and how the current perceptions of right and wrong colored the comments. I was also amused by the tone of moral indignation in the comments.
I suppose that I am of two minds of the post WWII period until 1960. No, I wasn’t quite there, but my early almost-adult memories of politics were centered around the demonization of the actions of the western countries while basking in the quite pleasant and comfortable consequences of those actions. We were rich and quite content with making money and keeping up with the Joneses on the profits from the war. But for some odd reason, the connection between the demonization and the lifestyle never really was mentioned in polite company.
Now that we are well past that time and those particular compromises that were made to enhance our current lifestyles (and this applies to all of us) are safely out of memory, I begin to wonder how the younglings see the period. From what I can tell, the vapid and judgmental tone of the previous owner of Mssr Greene’s work takes no account of the efforts made to craft the consumer culture and the sad chain of events that led us to the corner we are in. But now that the world is getting re-balanced and the last of the colonial powers are being forcefully beaten back, I wonder if the previous reader has trained their thoughts to the consequences of the loss of empire by the European powers and Russia.
I cannot see how we can pull what most people think of as a win out of the mess in the Mideast. I wonder if Russia can manage to pull out of the competitive control area that is the Ukraine (which, like it or not, is an empire-related war), I wonder if China will take up the role of imperial core in a more straightforward way. I am wondering if Iran will be able to edge back control of its hinterland. The outcome of those games will be the deciding factor of how the folks alive here in ‘murca will maintain, grow, or lose their lifestyles.
Wars are never fought for morality, they are fought for money. And the lifestyles that we really aren’t willing to give up are bought with that money and no other.


I have been reading about the Thirty Years War lately. I do enjoy the telling of a good yarn by the recent bards. Choosing the good and bad guys based on current morality is always amusing to watch because the purveyors of such nonsense are no different than the inquisitions or the Jesuits or the the completely messed up Hochadel who used the Protestant cause to steal back from the church what the church had stolen from someone else. Just ask the folks who made the error of following Thomas Müntzer how it worked out for them when they decided they didn’t want to be jumped-up slaves. Or to say that Martin Luther’s response to the Bauernkrieg was definitely not in the realm of what the teachings of Christ found acceptable.
What I found amusing was the idea of “put to the question”. In other words, torturing the person being questioned until he gave you the answer you wanted. Now, don’t think for a minute that the inquisition was the only practitioner of this methodology. Hell, we were(are?) waterboarding folks in the not too distant past (granted, a lot of the folks in the first half of the seventeenth century would have considered that practice unnecessarily humane, but that is neither here nor there).
But all of the above is just an aside from the point of this little piece. I am wandering about a tiny apartment here on the urban fringes in Oregon and I have decided that I am going to repurpose the phrase “the question” to my own purposes completely unrelated to the meaning I outlined in the earlier paragraphs.
My question rotates around a question asked by old men on a nearly daily basis.
“What the hell did I do with XXXX?). When trying to find something in a 525 square foot apartment and this question is blurted out, that is a clue either about your continued mental competency or how much shit you still have around you.
It's right on midnight and so it's time to launch a new Magic Monday. Ask me anything about occultism, and with certain exceptions noted below, any question received by midnight Monday Eastern time will get an answer. Please note: Any question or comment received after that point will not get an answer, and in fact will not be put through. If you're in a hurry, or suspect you may be the 341,928th person to ask a question, please check out the very rough version 1.3 of The Magic Monday FAQ here.
I've also had quite a few people over the years ask me where they should buy my books, and here's the answer. Bookshop.org is an alternative online bookstore that supports local bookstores and authors, which a certain gargantuan corporation doesn't, and I have a shop there, which you can check out here. Please consider patronizing it if you'd like to purchase any of my books online.