neonvincent: For posts about cats and activities involving uniforms. (Krosp)
neonvincent ([personal profile] neonvincent) wrote2025-11-26 02:02 pm

Excised video for second Macy's Parade post

I found a video I like better for Local news covers the marching bands in the 2025 Macy's Parade.

WLBT 3 On Your Side reporting Alcorn’s band heads to NYC to perform in Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.

Alcorn’s band heads to NYC to perform in Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade
milkyway1 ([personal profile] milkyway1) wrote2025-11-26 04:22 pm
Entry tags:

Weekly Blessing 100 – Wednesday, December 3rd, 2025

Once a week, I perform a formal blessing in which I bless everybody who has signed up for it.

In order to be blessed next Wednesday, please click here and sign up on my website.

I require people to sign up anew each week, to make sure I have everybody's full consent for each blessing (and to keep things manageable for me). I.e. if you'd like to receive blessings in future weeks, too, you'll need to return to the "Blessings" section of my website each week and sign up on the most recent post.
claire_58: (Default)
Claire ([personal profile] claire_58) wrote2025-11-25 11:20 am

Book Review: Hunt, Gather, Parent

 Hunt, Gather, Parent: what ancient cultures can teach us about the lost art of raising happy, helpful little humans by Michaeleen Doucleff PhD

 

Book Review

 

Hunt, Gather, Parent is a parenting manual that is actually well worth the time it takes to read. Doucleff and her 3year old daughter take us on a intimate tour to places and people whose parenting strategies are very different than those of the West. She shares the personal challenges and parental failings that spurred her to travel, research, and learn. More importantly she has broken out the specific strategies and techniques and demonstrated how to use them in the context of modern parenting.

 

The stories generated by her quest are engaging. The peoples she visits, Mayan, Inuit, and Hadzabe, are not untouched by the modern world but, crucially, they have managed to retain parenting techniques that have stood the test of time. The real treasure of the book is a very specific set of  skills that can have an immediate positive impact on family life.

 

The book is divided into 5 sections. Section one is an introduction which examines the challenges of parenting in the W.E.I.R.D. world. The main bulk of the book contains one section for each of the cultures she visits including the important skills each has to offer. The final section is a summary of the paradigm shift involved in changing the way we interact with our children.

 

The skills Doucleff describes are specific, practical, easy to use techniques. “Try It” exercises that include “dip your toe in,” and “jump in,” are sprinkled liberally throughout the book. A handy list of “Practical Sections” is attached to the Table of Contents for quick reference. 

 

Doucleff emphasizes that these techniques can be used with children of any age and includes age specific approaches where applicable. She has used them successfully with her own daughter and with other children who have visited in her home. She has even used them when dealing with co-workers and other unrelated adults. 

 

The techniques in this book can’t solve the larger W.E.I.R.D. world problems of parent-child isolation or the lack of community support and shared assumptions about how to parent. No single book can. But they can help all of us discover or rediscover the joy of parenting and the ease of harmonious relationships with the tiny humans entrusted to our care.

neonvincent: For posts about cats and activities involving uniforms. (Krosp)
neonvincent ([personal profile] neonvincent) wrote2025-11-25 01:58 pm

Rejected video for Macy's Parade post

This didn't mention the Spartans marching in the Macy's Parade, so I didn't include it in WMUR covers the Spartans in the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade.

ecosophia: (Default)
John Michael Greer ([personal profile] ecosophia) wrote2025-11-25 08:00 am

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 223

you were the researchWe are now into the fifth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary all these years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health remain anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; new revelations are leaking out about just how bad the Covid vaccines are for human health; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

7. Please don't post LLM ("AI") generated text. This is a place for human beings to talk to other human beings, not for the regurgitation of machine-generated text. Also, please don't discuss large language models (the technology popularly and inaccurately called "artificial intelligence" these days) except as they bear directly on the Covid phenomenon. Here again, my finger is hovering over the delete button. 

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 
kimberlysteele: (Default)
Kimberly Steele ([personal profile] kimberlysteele) wrote2025-11-24 11:32 am
Entry tags:

Untouched: Golden Girls Rule, Plastic Girls Drool

 
 Clockwise from top left: Frances McDormand, Sigourney Weaver, Morgan Freeman, Emma Thompson, Viola Davis, Brigitte Bardot
 
Last week, I published an essay called Chopped that got a surprising amount of traction. I publish two essays a week, one public essay here at Dreamwidth that is reblogged on Substack and one private, Substack subscriber only essay that gets added to a collection that readers can access via a paywall of either $5 a month or $40 per year. The Chopped essay blew up on Substack. I usually get around 300 readers for any given essay on Substack; less than a week after writing it, Chopped has surpassed the 10,000 mark. Part of this surge in popularity was a single paragraph about transexual hormones and surgeries as part of the barbarism of modern surgical amputation practices. This apparently pissed off the Delusion Affirming Care/child genital mutilation fetishist crowd. They further boosted Chopped's visibility by leaving butthurt troll comments with predictable outrage and demands that I show citations and credentials. The underemployed liberal women were so mad that I did not kowtow to their wishes that I censor myself, they made sure to promote the evilly evil evilness of Kimberly Steele in every corner of Substack for fear that the entire platform would not realize I am a mean bully. As a previous unknown, I owe them my thanks for all the free publicity.

Clearly people want to discuss the hideous evils of plastic surgery and youth chasing procedures, and I will be writing about those subjects in the future. For now, I am going to pull a Pollyanna and focus on the positive, because even though it may only appeal to my old numbers of readers, it is one of my core philosophies and aims in life to build up the good by relentlessly focusing upon it.

They Live

The expansion in number of both famous and non-famous people who opt for ghastly, faux-youth extending procedures and treatments is not going to halt anytime soon. Goldie Hawn, who of all people should have known better, became Death Becomes Her. Lauren Sanchez's face looks like a pincushion, and chances are it acts like one too whenever she is behind a beauty "expert's" closed doors. Jocelyn Wildenstein looks like Frankenstein's monster, a patchwork of scar tissue, her expressions constrained and tight as she squints through a heavy, inflexible mask of rope and hardened bands that appear as if one or more will snap if she sneezes. More ghoulish than the botched, Saw doll Madame puppets are the plastic ice princesses. They look like slightly different alters of their own young selves. They might be clones. Kris Jenner, Martha Stewart, and Lindsay Lohan are not the ones we knew. At least the butchered versions of Goldie Hawn, Lauren Sanchez, and Wilden-franken-stein assuredly still walk among the living. Poor Lindsay Lohan appears to have been erased and replaced, her entire drug-addled history vanished down an eerie memory hole. She emerged into 2024's scenery eight inches taller, sans her trademark freckles, and beige blond like an AI butterfly from a cocoon of black mirrors.

Who knows what uncanny, Stepford transformations and soul swaps await the current set of Hollywood freaks who dress old hunks of moldy, petrified cheese in surface layers of bright, orange Velveeta? 

Not all celebrities . . . 

Let's forget those losers for a hot minute to look at some unusual, lucid examples of what sane aging looks like. I am not going to speak to the potentially problematical personalities or misdeeds of any of the following celebrities. That is not the point of this essay, though I will not prevent anyone from discussing it in the comments. 

I would like to sing the praises of some famous people who have had little to no work done, that is all, in hopes of encouraging more people to tread the same unadulterated path.

Frances McDormand is a very good actress, and perhaps if any actress could have pulled off a perpetual LARP of an ingenue, it was her. She definitely had the acting chops. Thankfully, she has not chosen to go that route. McDormand was never a bombshell, and her roles have reflected this sober reality over the years: she is more gritty than pretty. Affable and funny, she has stayed relatable. Nevertheless, like many celebrities, she is a good looking person with excellent bone structure. She has thin lips. Instead of making her lips into small rubber tires, she looks refreshingly human.

Sigourney Weaver and Frances McDormand could be sisters by another mister, both in looks and in their avoidance of bombshell roles over the years. Like McDormand, Weaver could never pull off the cupcake princess schtick anyway, and perhaps that has been her secret weapon all along. She too has small lips. She has taken a hard pass when it comes to inflating her mouth to resemble the ass of a baboon in heat. Her hooded eyes have the loveliest of creases under them. They are a nice complement to her other stately wrinkles, hopefully the markers of a life well-lived.

Morgan Freeman is almost 90 and does not look a day over 78 LOL. He is as bald as a cue ball these days. My father, who died at 85, had little to no hair from age 35 onward. Men go bald. This is not a big deal. Seeing it is also not a big deal. Again, Freeman has excellent celebrity bone structure, and that bone structure has not betrayed him. He has sagging and white hair on his brows and chin as we would expect.

Viola Davis is a good, young looking 60, her face and body only hinting at the march of age. She does not, however, look 20 in any way, shape, or form, and thank heaven and her own good taste and foresight for that. Her forehead wrinkles like a crumpled paper sack when she scowls or cries. There are no fillers to stiffen it or to make her cheeks inflate like water balloons. In a sea of human flotation devices, she has opted not to look like a mannequin with a peanut allergy.

Emma Thompson got in hot water when she called modern day plastic youth chasing a "collective psychosis" and "a very strange thing to do". In a 2014 Hello Magazine interview, Thompson said, 
 

"It's chronically unhealthy and there's this very serious side to all of that because we're going to end up with this sort of 'super-culture' that's going to suggest to young people, girls and boys, that this looks normal. And it's not normal."


We have arrived at the super-culture of which Thompson spoke. Rhinoplasty, Botox, fillers, and lip fillers are all the rage among Gen Z, the average member of which is in her early 20s. Yikes. 

Thompson's ongoing condemnation of plastic procedures triggered RealSelf writer Suzy Katz, who describes herself as a recovering plastic surgery addict. Katz quickly pounced on Thompson's proclamations in her more recent interview, accusing Thompson of blaming women for the "intense scrutiny society puts on their looks".

The idea that "society", that vague, amorphous monolith that cannot be boiled down to any individual's choices, is the ultimate motivation for dicing up your own face like a Thanksgiving turkey, is ludicrous. It is a cop out and a ruse. 

I am society. You are society. We are all society and therefore we share the responsibility of making society. Suzy Katz would like to diffuse and abdicate responsibility, but I will argue that she stood for nothing and fell for everything. 

I can forgive her for this sin despite her not asking for my forgiveness. We all have been hoodwinked at some time or another, and plastic surgery/procedure people, with their mutilated faces and bodies, are forced to wear the permanent marks of having been made into somebody's bitch. Their plight is understandable and forgivable. What I cannot forgive is the arrogant doubling down on the claim that wearing youth like a minstrel's mask is defensible and good. I grow especially prickly when the victims of such grotesque procedures insist they are normal and healthy.

Ugly on the inside


The bone I have to pick with the transhumanist meat Lego/Potato Head project is that it trains each successive generation with increased intensity to focus its time, resources, and medical expertise on stuff that does not deserve to matter, especially once we have reached a certain age. It is one thing for a teenager to be obsessed with fashion, hair, and other manifestations of etheric maleness, but teenage dreams have no place in middle age. The austerity of middle age is not superior to the frivolity of youth; neither is better nor worse than the other. The key is recognizing that they are both very different to each other, and to each there is a season.

In my own case, a solid decade of daily discursive meditation and slightly less time spent in daily banishing rituals and divination have transformed middle age into the happiest, most fruitful, and tranquil era of my life. Perception deepens in middle age, or at least it has for me, and despite writing two essays per week for the last two years and producing an upcoming book called Sacred Homemaking: A Magical Approach to Tidying, I only ever put the tiniest amount of my perceptions into my scribblings. 

How to be popular

As a former dysmorphic, middle age has been especially healing for its release of daily concern about my looks. I have finally gotten it through my own thick skull that others do not care what I look like (with proper exceptions for decency and hygiene, of course). No, others want to be SEEN, and not for their physical beauty or its flaws, but for the goodness and light they hold within. 

Make a point of regularly seeing beyond hairstyles, clothing, acne outbreaks, and weight and you will be more popular than you ever dreamed you could become. Like you, others desperately want to be appreciated and thanked for their good works. It really is that simple. 

I appreciate the guy who bagged my groceries quickly and neatly. He did far better than I could do in the same amount of time. I thank him. Nothing elaborate, just a quick "Thank you" and a smile that meets his eyes. When someone stayed stopped on the way into the intersection to allow my car into the line, I always wave because he or she did not have to stop for me. When my husband does the dishes, buys snacks, or makes dinner, I always thank him at least once. I do not do it out of obeisance or guilt, but because I genuinely appreciate not having to do those things for myself. 

My focus is not on people's looks and in return, their focus is not on my looks. At age 52, I still field compliments addressing the way I look, though they are not nearly as frequent as they used to be. I was always a young looking person despite having avoided cosmetic procedures, and though I am a little overweight, I have always barely squeezed into the current ideal of thinness enough to pass. I am the perfect candidate for a brutalist makeover that would convince the world I am 25 again. No thanks.

I had my moment in the sun. I was extremely pretty and my body was spectacular at age 20. I also took antidepressants, smoked cigarettes, and barely ate when I was 20. I was gorgeous and dreadfully unhappy. In middle age, I am no longer drop dead gorgeous but I am happy. Having lived through both, they do sometimes seem to be mutually exclusive realms. I'll happily take the second one over the first.

 


Brigitte Bardot, then and now


The sexiest woman alive

Brigitte Bardot was arguably once the sexiest woman alive. She was hotter than I ever was at the same age, and chances are she was hotter than you at that age. Bo Derek, the supposed Perfect 10, was more like an 8.5 compared to Bardot at her peak. Bardot's fate was to be cast and re-cast as a bimbo with only a few serious roles. Like Marilyn Monroe, most audiences never fully accepted Bardot as anything but eye candy. Of course unlike Monroe, Bardot survived to the current day. Along the way, however, she lost her looks, and much to the chagrin of the System, this seems to have been deliberate. Bardot gained weight, got some jowls, and generally did not alter what age brought. She is now 91 and looks 91. Her hair is gray, her neck is craggy and sagging, and her decolletage is well-covered. She is perfect. She is how I imagine I will be at 91 if I do things right. 

Bardot came out strong for animal activism in 1962 and later said, "I gave my youth and beauty to men. I gave my wisdom and experience to animals." 

Bardot often felt hunted, especially as a young beauty, and had she gone down the well-traveled road of plastic renewals, she would have perpetuated more of the same. Instead, she flipped the script. She gave the proverbial bird to the drooling, pornified, sex-on-the-brain coomers and allowed Nature to mute her beauty, at least on the outside.

Sounds like a solid plan.
 



degringolade: (Default)
Degringolade ([personal profile] degringolade) wrote2025-11-24 03:31 pm

Diary: Monday Morning

Got out and about a little bit yesterday. I am working on getting out after a period of being a sluggard, I suppose that mentally I usually take a while to mentally adapt to the days growing ridiculously short. This set of blah's is set into overdrive by the change in daylight savings time and then a couple of weeks after that I manage to claw my way out of the doldrums.

So I am getting ready for a 10:00 AM start of a brisk waddle around the neighborhood. This activity is helped along by caffeine and raingear. Maybe today I will wander down to the local bagel stand and see what they have in the day-olds. They aren't the best bagels in the world, but they are better than the ones that come from Walmart. I would be happy if someone here in puddletown would actually make boiled bagels, but the uppity white people here would probably turn up their noses after being fed the fiction that the mini bread rolls with a hole are actually bagels.

That's the day here, I got nothing else exciting

[odd autumn colors.jpg]

neonvincent: For general posts about politics not covered by other icons (Uncle V wants you)
neonvincent ([personal profile] neonvincent) wrote2025-11-24 09:12 am
ecosophia: (Default)
John Michael Greer ([personal profile] ecosophia) wrote2025-11-23 09:49 pm

Magic Monday

settle for this, sucka!It's almost midnight and so it's time to launch a new Magic Monday. Ask me anything about occultism, and with certain exceptions noted below, any question received by midnight Monday Eastern time will get an answer. Please note:  Any question or comment received after that point will not get an answer, and in fact will not be put through.  If you're in a hurry, or suspect you may be the 341,928th person to ask a question, please check out the very rough version 1.3 of The Magic Monday FAQ here

Also:
 I will not be putting through or answering any more questions about practicing magic around children. I've answered those in simple declarative sentences in the FAQ. If you read the FAQ and don't think your question has been answered, read it again. If that doesn't help, consider remedial reading classes; yes, it really is as simple and straightforward as the FAQ says.  And further:  I've decided that questions about getting goodies from spirits are also permanently off topic here. The point of occultism is to develop your own capacities, not to try to bully or wheedle other beings into doing things for you. I've discussed this in a post on my blog.

(The image? I've finished the sequence of my published books; while I decide what I want to do next, I have some memes to share.)

Buy Me A Coffee

Ko-Fi

I've had several people ask about tipping me for answers here, and though I certainly don't require that I won't turn it down. You can use either of the links above to access my online tip jar; Buymeacoffee is good for small tips, Ko-Fi is better for larger ones. (I used to use PayPal but they developed an allergy to free speech, so I've developed an allergy to them.) If you're interested in political and economic astrology, or simply prefer to use a subscription service to support your favorite authors, you can find my Patreon page here and my SubscribeStar page here
 
Bookshop logoI've also had quite a few people over the years ask me where they should buy my books, and here's the answer. Bookshop.org is an alternative online bookstore that supports local bookstores and authors, which a certain gargantuan corporation doesn't, and I have a shop there, which you can check out here. Please consider patronizing it if you'd like to purchase any of my books online.

And don't forget to look up your Pangalactic New Age Soul Signature at CosmicOom.com.

With that said, have at it!

***This Magic Monday is now closed and no further comments will be put through. See you next week!***
degringolade: (Default)
Degringolade ([personal profile] degringolade) wrote2025-11-23 04:05 pm

Diary: Sunday Morning Expectations

I am always worried that one of these pieces that I dash off in the morning while drinking my coffee will drift into the realm of whining. I am overall pretty content with my life and much of the time I am relieved that I managed to avoid (or, being realistic, it avoided me) the curse of success in America.

I suppose that my expectations have never been all that high. When they were at their highest, I was not any more happy than I am today. I really don't own any more than I did when I was living in the dorms at the U. of Utah in the early seventies and I was just about content then just like I am just about content now.

Ambition and expectations change over the years. Much of it is situational and transient. I genuinely wonder how much of the dissatisfaction with "your life" has in it as a source a perceived requirement from a person that you used to be.

For your viewing pleasure (disgust? Kinda depends.) this was last night's dinner, fried bologna sandwich grilled with swiss cheese on homemade bread washed down with a cold Coors. The cup was from tea earlier in the day (you can still see the "clampy thingy"). The little bowl is my incense bowl filled with white sand..

[bologna.jpg]

neonvincent: For posts about food and cooking (All your bouillabaisse are belong to us)
neonvincent ([personal profile] neonvincent) wrote2025-11-23 10:39 am
Entry tags:
milkyway1 ([personal profile] milkyway1) wrote2025-11-23 11:19 am

Modern Order of Essenes Course: Healer – Unit 20

Unit 20 of the Modern Order of Essenes course just went up, the last unit of the Healer grade. Congratulations to everybody who reached this stage! :-)

Click here to get straight to Unit 20.
ecosophia: (Default)
John Michael Greer ([personal profile] ecosophia) wrote2025-11-22 06:49 pm

JMG in NYC

manhattanJust a heads up -- a fortunate conjunction of events will have me in New York City on the weekend of December 19-21. I'll be taking in Mozart's opera The Magic Flute on the evening of the 19th and attending an esoteric lodge meeting on the afternoon of the next day, but I don't have anything scheduled for the evening of Saturday the 20th. If any of my readers would like to get together somewhere in lower Manhattan or points nearby that evening, I'm up for it. Let me know! 
degringolade: (Default)
Degringolade ([personal profile] degringolade) wrote2025-11-22 04:53 pm

Diary: Pet Peeve Y-axis

I suppose on of the things that annoy me about any "serious" post concerning "serious" subjects like finance or weather is that the persons writing the piece treat the graphs like sales tools instead of means to accurately convey information. Simply put, they use the Y-axis to make a sale for their way of thinking by limiting the amount of information conveyed/

Consider this little post over at Twitter (BTW, I refuse to call it X: to understand see this post).

Look carefully at the axes. The 36 month X-axis makes me suspicious in the first place. Why was this period chosen? If we are attempting to place where we are in the decline of the preferred human environment, The first CERES satellite was launched in 1997. I think that a a three year period out the the nearly 30 years of data collection is suspect.

The Y-axis is even more interesting. Again, you have to consider this in relationship to the X-axis, Is the left end of the graph a temporal Maximum and we are working from there. Or has it been a steady decline over the 28 years of data collection? For that matter, what datasets are being actually analyzed?

Look, I am not saying that the data is wrong, but it really seem to me that the data is incomplete and presented in a way to support a claim (read here: Sales) rather than giving the reader a full understanding of long-term climate trends. Three years and 0.65% might be significant, but I cannot make a judgement from the data presented.

I am convinced that climate change has an anthropomorphic element. But unless the people trying to educate start giving complete and accurate information, their current cherry-picking of data and deliberate efforts to frighten will allow the people with different opinions to further undermine decisions.

(Side Note: I cropped the photo below, both X and Y-axis. But I did so to show the goddamn squirrel trying to guilt me out for inadequate peanuts, you don't need my window frame to convey that. It is not dissimilar from that which the "scientist" above did with the data presented but I felt in this case you needed a unnecessary warning)

[Squirrel.jpg]

neonvincent: Lust for  for posts about sex and women behaving badly. (Bad Girl Lust)
neonvincent ([personal profile] neonvincent) wrote2025-11-22 10:36 am
Entry tags:
neptunesdolphins: dolphins leaping (Default)
neptunesdolphins ([personal profile] neptunesdolphins) wrote2025-11-22 09:52 am

“The Night Speaks” by Steven Forrest: How Astrology Works: 2 of 2

Notes:

Note 1. Steven Forrest identifies himself as a Goddess worshipper.
 
Note 2. Not to be confused with astrophobia, the intense and irrational fear of stars, space, or the night sky. I have astrophobia, in the form of an intense fear of asteroids, as a result of the accident causing my brain injury.
 
Note 3: Carl Jung explained synchronicity as follows, “Synchronicity is not a philosophical view but an empirical concept which postulates an intellectually necessary principle.” He defined synchronicity as “the simultaneous occurrence of a certain psychic state with one or more external events which appears as meaningful parallels to the momentary subjective state.”
 
Note 4. The Pauli Exclusion Principle states that, “in a single atom, no two electrons will have an identical set or the same quantum numbers (n, l, ml, and ms).” To put it in simple terms, every electron should have or be in its own unique state (singlet state). There are two salient rules that the Pauli exclusion principle follows: Only two electrons can occupy the same orbital.
 
The two electrons that are present in the same orbital must have opposite spins, or they should be antiparallel.” (From: “Pauli’s Exclusion Principle,” https://byjus.com/jee/pauli-exclusion-principle/) The principle helps to explain a wide variety of physical phenomena such as the chemical properties of solids.
 
Note 5. Quaternity: A four-fold structure that is usually a square or circle, and symmetrical. A Quaternity usually points to the idea of wholeness.
 
Note 6. Carl Jung and Wolfgang Pauli, “The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche.” 1952.
 
Note 7. Pauli merged Space and Time as a single entity. He contrasted Energy (Momentum and Matter) with Space-Time. According to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, the more that is known about Space-Time, the less is known about Energy-Momentum. (“A particle’s position and velocity cannot be measured precisely simultaneously.”)
 
Further reading on Carl Jung and Wolfgang Pauli’s collaboration.
“The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche – Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle” by C.G. Jung & “The Influence of Archetypal Ideas on the Scientific Theories of Kepler” by W. Pauli (translated by R.F.C. Hull). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited. 1955.
 
Peat, F. David, “Divine Contenders: Wolfgang Pauli and the Symmetry of the World.” The Pari Center, Web. https://paricenter.com/library-new/c-g-jung/divine-contenders-wolfgang-pauli-and-the-symmetry-of-the-world/
 
Further reading on the Quantum Universe and Synchronicity
Burns, Anthony, “Ultimum Mysterium,” Winchester (UK): 6th Books. 2016.
Combs, Allan and Mark Holland, “Synchronicity.” New York: Marlow & Comp. 1996.
Pratt, Carl, “Quantum Physics for Beginners.” Quantum Quill Press. 2024.
kimberlysteele: (Default)
Kimberly Steele ([personal profile] kimberlysteele) wrote2025-11-21 08:15 pm
Entry tags:

Ogham Readings on Saturdays




I am happy to read your Ogham free of charge -- that's how I hone my divination skills. Please limit your reading request to four or fewer Ogham cards: though this can take many forms, here are some common ones (all of them are basically combos of 4 cards):

 
-a single three card reading for the week or month and a one-off, one card reading
-four questions about four separate items that require one answer (card) per item
-a one card reading to answer a specific question and a three card for a more nuanced question
-Two separate readings, two cards a piece exploring the positives and negatives of two different choices

I am happy to do Ogham readings confidentially via emails -- just email me at k steele studio at gmail during the allotted time/before deadline. I cannot answer health questions. If you have a question about health or another sensitive, private matter, provide a bunch of non-identifying information and the Ogham will be able to figure it out even if I don't. I'm serious... the Ogham actually tend to "know" things without me being privy to what is going on.

Please note I take time off during Solstices and Equinoxes for Druid stuff and because sometimes I simply need a break.

My next planned break is from December 18 - January 8.

I take reading requests from whenever this post goes up on Friday night until 8pm US Central Time Saturday.

For a more in depth look into how I read and interpret the Ogham's symbols, please visit my website druidogham.wordpress.com.

I am currently trying to minimize my use of PayPal. If you'd like to make a donation, I would be grateful if you did it here:

http://buymeacoffee.com/kimberlysteele

Your prayers of blessing to the deity/deities of your choice are welcome whether or not you can donate.

Brenainn ([personal profile] brenainn) wrote2025-11-21 05:05 pm

Joseph Smith

And now, time for something that I’ve written. My experiences with Carl Jung have led me to reconsider another spiritual figure, this time one from my own past. This would be Joseph Smith. I do believe he was a genuine prophet. That began not long after some young missionaries showed up at my door in 2010. I had been Catholic for a few years, and was mostly (though not entirely) happy with it. When these young men came knocking, I really had no interest in leaving the Church. Still, they were pleasant young men and, since I like reading, I did accept their offer of a copy of the Book of Mormon. As I began reading it, I didn’t get a burning in the bosom or whatnot. I did find the narrative mildly interesting.

After about a week or so, though, as I was sitting on my porch, I suddenly had a sort of vision (it was kind of transparent, but the images were discernible) of Nephi and his family on a ship bound for the Americas. At least, I assume it was showing me this. The vision was of a scene where I could see a tall man standing at the bow, surrounded by his family. There were no sounds or anything, just the images (I’m not even sure they were moving in this vision). It lasted only a few moments but after that, I was convinced of Joseph Smith’s prophethood. I actually called up those missionaries and they literally came running over, because I told them I wanted to be baptized in their church. I later found out that they had gotten a number of calls that day from others they’d been visiting, telling them to stop coming by or canceling appointments. I’m guessing my phone call was a welcome change.

Anyway, they met with me for a couple of weeks, getting the six lessons out of the way, and then I was baptized into the LDS tradition. But the reality of life in a branch (my area didn’t have enough Mormons for a full ward) was rather different from what I might have expected (I guess lots of the Holy Ghost?). In fact, the local members, while mostly pleasant, were about as exciting as one of those bloodless Protestant worship services that JMG has mentioned. I also saw some uncharitable stuff that I won’t go into, and was eventually the recipient of some unkindness. So, I stopped attending and eventually resigned my membership. I returned to the practice of Catholicism, but I’ve never quite been able to put to rest my belief in Joseph Smith himself.

I know, he’s a controversial figure. There are some unsavory aspects of his history. Nonetheless, as I’ve gotten more familiar with the concept of the “holy scoundrel,” I’ve been thinking more and more about taking up some kind of veneration of Joseph Smith, and see where it goes. At this point, I’m such an oddball polytheistic heterodox cultural Catholic something or other, that it doesn’t really bother me to make a go of it. I am not, to be clear, interested in rejoining the LDS church or any of the other offshoots. This is, to borrow a common Evangelical phrase (but in a way that would no doubt horrify them!), an effort to form a personal relationship with the Prophet Joseph Smith, and see what spiritual benefits come from that.
Brenainn ([personal profile] brenainn) wrote2025-11-21 04:20 pm

Henotheistic Catholicism

So, I decided to play around some with Skynet, er, I mean, Grok. Yes, I know, AI is, well, whatever. I've mostly used it for amusement but I decided to ask a relatively serious question: propose a henotheistic form of Roman Catholicism. Here is what it spit out:

Sancta Ecclesia Polytheistica Catholica

(“The Holy Polytheistic Catholic Church”)

A thought-experiment in how Roman Catholicism could be re-imagined as an explicitly henotheistic (one supreme deity, many real subordinate gods) and genuinely tolerant polytheistic tradition without abandoning its core identity, liturgy, scripture, or seven sacraments.

1. Core Theological Re-framing

  • The One Most High God (Deus Altissimus, or simply “the Father”) remains the uncreated, boundless source of all being—exactly as in Nicene orthodoxy.
  • All other gods (the old Roman deities, the saints raised to divine status, national gods of other peoples, and even the tolerated gods of contemporary Pagans) are understood to be:
    • Real, personal, immortal beings
    • Created by and subordinate to the Most High
    • Finite in power and knowledge
    • Legitimate rulers over particular peoples, places, forces of nature, and human activities
  • This is essentially the worldview of late-antique Platonism (Iamblichus, Proclus) and of many Church Fathers before Augustine closed the door: the gods exist, but there is one God above the gods (Psalm 82:1, 1 Cor 8:5–6 re-read literally).

2. The New Creed (re-worded Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed, 381, with only three changes)

“We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible, source of all gods and of all creation…

And in one Lord Jesus Christ… by whom all things were made, both the cosmos and the gods who govern its parts…

We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life… We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins… We look for the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come, when every god and goddess shall bow before the throne of the Most High. Amen.”

3. The Pantheon and the Communion of Saints

  • Canonized saints are now explicitly recognized as having become “gods by grace” (theosis taken literally).
  • The older Roman gods who converted or showed favor to the Church (e.g., Castor and Pollux appearing at Lake Regillus, the Dioscuri on the façade of many Venetian churches) are venerated as real divine powers who have bent the knee to Christ.
  • Unconverted but non-hostile gods (e.g., Shinto kami, Hindu devas, the Lwa, certain Nordic aesir, etc.) are treated with the same respectful distance once given to “high-pagan” deities in the Roman Empire: they rule their peoples lawfully under the Most High and may be offered courteous cultus by their own devotees.

4. Liturgical Practice

  • The Mass remains exactly the Roman Rite (Tridentine or Novus Ordo according to preference), because the Eucharist is still the sacrifice offered to the Most High through Christ.
  • A new minor order of priests—“pontifices secundarii”—is created for those called to serve particular national or local gods under the oversight of the Catholic hierarchy. Their ordination includes the ancient Roman formula: “May the god/goddess N. accept you as his/her priest.”
  • On certain feast days, guest priests of other living polytheisms may offer incense (never blood sacrifice inside a church) to their own deities in the side chapels, provided they first offer a pinch to the Most High and to Christ.

5. The Calendar

January 1 Circumcision of the Lord – also ancient feast of Janus
February 5 St. Agatha – also Roman feast of Concordia
March 1 St. David of Wales – local Celtic deities welcomed
June 24 Nativity of St. John the Baptist – paralleled with summer-solstice gods
August 15 Assumption of Mary – understood as the apotheosis of the Theotokos into Queen of All Gods
December 17–23 The old Saturnalia is restored as a nine-day carnival under the patronage of Saturnus and Ops, explicitly permitted by the Church as “the rejoicing of the elder gods who have submitted to Christ.”

6. Official Policy of Toleration (from an imaginary papal encyclical “Plures Dii, Una Majestas”)

“All gods who do not actively war against the Most High or demand human sacrifice may be lawfully worshipped by their peoples. Catholics may participate in civic rites to these gods as acts of courtesy, provided the primacy of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is inwardly preserved. Forced conversion of polytheists is forbidden; the Church grows by persuasion and example, not by the sword.”

7. Iconography and Church Decoration

  • The apse still shows Christ Pantocrator.
  • The side aisles now contain statues of Mars Gradivus (patron of soldiers who protect the Church), Minerva Medica (healing), Hercules (strength), the Dioscuri, local river gods, etc.—each crowned with the Chi-Rho or holding a small cross to symbolize submission.
  • Mary is titled “Magna Mater Deorum Catholica”—Great Mother of the Catholic Gods.

In short, this re-imagined Church keeps everything Catholics love—Mass, sacraments, hierarchy, Marian devotion, monasticism—while openly acknowledging the gods that most ancient Catholics quietly believed were still out there anyway. It is Rome’s old genius for syncretism and universality, resurrected for a post-monotheist age.

I'll admit that I find it rather intriguing. I'll leave it to anyone reading this to reach their own conclusions, of course.

degringolade: (Default)
Degringolade ([personal profile] degringolade) wrote2025-11-21 03:50 pm

Diary: Crows

So crows are hanging around for the winter which is their normal routine. I will be ordering peanuts for their dining pleasure (the jays are welcome as well, but they are much more obnoxious, especially the pretty-boy steller's). I have been taken to task for feeding them cheap Wal-Mart peanuts in the shell. The bird weirdo's that take umbrage at my feeding them cheap peanuts feel I should purchase for-purpose organic peanuts because the poor birds deserve only the best. They come nearly unglued when I tell them sometimes I feed the birds salted peanuts. These are a huge hit and disappear incredibly fast, the squirrels who share the feast uninvited seem especially taken. I figure if the salt hasn't killed me, it won't kill the boidies.

For the small birds this year, I have decided that they will only get suet blocks. It isn't that I am cheap, but all the different "sparrows" (chickadees, juncos, sparrows, finches, etc) are a bunch of slobs. If I put out seed, most of it seems to end up on the ground beneath the feeder. While I am certain that something eats the fallen seed, I don't really want mice and other rodents taking advantage. It is bad enough with the goddamn squirrels.

[Crow and Tree.jpg]