Excised video for second Macy's Parade post
WLBT 3 On Your Side reporting Alcorn’s band heads to NYC to perform in Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.
Alcorn’s band heads to NYC to perform in Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade
WLBT 3 On Your Side reporting Alcorn’s band heads to NYC to perform in Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.
Alcorn’s band heads to NYC to perform in Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade
Book Review
Hunt, Gather, Parent is a parenting manual that is actually well worth the time it takes to read. Doucleff and her 3year old daughter take us on a intimate tour to places and people whose parenting strategies are very different than those of the West. She shares the personal challenges and parental failings that spurred her to travel, research, and learn. More importantly she has broken out the specific strategies and techniques and demonstrated how to use them in the context of modern parenting.
The stories generated by her quest are engaging. The peoples she visits, Mayan, Inuit, and Hadzabe, are not untouched by the modern world but, crucially, they have managed to retain parenting techniques that have stood the test of time. The real treasure of the book is a very specific set of skills that can have an immediate positive impact on family life.
The book is divided into 5 sections. Section one is an introduction which examines the challenges of parenting in the W.E.I.R.D. world. The main bulk of the book contains one section for each of the cultures she visits including the important skills each has to offer. The final section is a summary of the paradigm shift involved in changing the way we interact with our children.
The skills Doucleff describes are specific, practical, easy to use techniques. “Try It” exercises that include “dip your toe in,” and “jump in,” are sprinkled liberally throughout the book. A handy list of “Practical Sections” is attached to the Table of Contents for quick reference.
Doucleff emphasizes that these techniques can be used with children of any age and includes age specific approaches where applicable. She has used them successfully with her own daughter and with other children who have visited in her home. She has even used them when dealing with co-workers and other unrelated adults.
The techniques in this book can’t solve the larger W.E.I.R.D. world problems of parent-child isolation or the lack of community support and shared assumptions about how to parent. No single book can. But they can help all of us discover or rediscover the joy of parenting and the ease of harmonious relationships with the tiny humans entrusted to our care.
We are now into the fifth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary all these years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health remain anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause;
Who knows what uncanny, Stepford transformations and soul swaps await the current set of Hollywood freaks who dress old hunks of moldy, petrified cheese in surface layers of bright, orange Velveeta?
Not all celebrities . . .
Let's forget those losers for a hot minute to look at some unusual, lucid examples of what sane aging looks like. I am not going to speak to the potentially problematical personalities or misdeeds of any of the following celebrities. That is not the point of this essay, though I will not prevent anyone from discussing it in the comments.
I would like to sing the praises of some famous people who have had little to no work done, that is all, in hopes of encouraging more people to tread the same unadulterated path.
Frances McDormand is a very good actress, and perhaps if any actress could have pulled off a perpetual LARP of an ingenue, it was her. She definitely had the acting chops. Thankfully, she has not chosen to go that route. McDormand was never a bombshell, and her roles have reflected this sober reality over the years: she is more gritty than pretty. Affable and funny, she has stayed relatable. Nevertheless, like many celebrities, she is a good looking person with excellent bone structure. She has thin lips. Instead of making her lips into small rubber tires, she looks refreshingly human.
Sigourney Weaver and Frances McDormand could be sisters by another mister, both in looks and in their avoidance of bombshell roles over the years. Like McDormand, Weaver could never pull off the cupcake princess schtick anyway, and perhaps that has been her secret weapon all along. She too has small lips. She has taken a hard pass when it comes to inflating her mouth to resemble the ass of a baboon in heat. Her hooded eyes have the loveliest of creases under them. They are a nice complement to her other stately wrinkles, hopefully the markers of a life well-lived.
Morgan Freeman is almost 90 and does not look a day over 78 LOL. He is as bald as a cue ball these days. My father, who died at 85, had little to no hair from age 35 onward. Men go bald. This is not a big deal. Seeing it is also not a big deal. Again, Freeman has excellent celebrity bone structure, and that bone structure has not betrayed him. He has sagging and white hair on his brows and chin as we would expect.
Viola Davis is a good, young looking 60, her face and body only hinting at the march of age. She does not, however, look 20 in any way, shape, or form, and thank heaven and her own good taste and foresight for that. Her forehead wrinkles like a crumpled paper sack when she scowls or cries. There are no fillers to stiffen it or to make her cheeks inflate like water balloons. In a sea of human flotation devices, she has opted not to look like a mannequin with a peanut allergy.
Emma Thompson got in hot water when she called modern day plastic youth chasing a "collective psychosis" and "a very strange thing to do". In a 2014 Hello Magazine interview, Thompson said,
"It's chronically unhealthy and there's this very serious side to all of that because we're going to end up with this sort of 'super-culture' that's going to suggest to young people, girls and boys, that this looks normal. And it's not normal."

Brigitte Bardot, then and now
The sexiest woman alive
Brigitte Bardot was arguably once the sexiest woman alive. She was hotter than I ever was at the same age, and chances are she was hotter than you at that age. Bo Derek, the supposed Perfect 10, was more like an 8.5 compared to Bardot at her peak. Bardot's fate was to be cast and re-cast as a bimbo with only a few serious roles. Like Marilyn Monroe, most audiences never fully accepted Bardot as anything but eye candy. Of course unlike Monroe, Bardot survived to the current day. Along the way, however, she lost her looks, and much to the chagrin of the System, this seems to have been deliberate. Bardot gained weight, got some jowls, and generally did not alter what age brought. She is now 91 and looks 91. Her hair is gray, her neck is craggy and sagging, and her decolletage is well-covered. She is perfect. She is how I imagine I will be at 91 if I do things right.
Bardot came out strong for animal activism in 1962 and later said, "I gave my youth and beauty to men. I gave my wisdom and experience to animals."
Bardot often felt hunted, especially as a young beauty, and had she gone down the well-traveled road of plastic renewals, she would have perpetuated more of the same. Instead, she flipped the script. She gave the proverbial bird to the drooling, pornified, sex-on-the-brain coomers and allowed Nature to mute her beauty, at least on the outside.
Sounds like a solid plan.
Got out and about a little bit yesterday. I am working on getting out after a period of being a sluggard, I suppose that mentally I usually take a while to mentally adapt to the days growing ridiculously short. This set of blah's is set into overdrive by the change in daylight savings time and then a couple of weeks after that I manage to claw my way out of the doldrums.
So I am getting ready for a 10:00 AM start of a brisk waddle around the neighborhood. This activity is helped along by caffeine and raingear. Maybe today I will wander down to the local bagel stand and see what they have in the day-olds. They aren't the best bagels in the world, but they are better than the ones that come from Walmart. I would be happy if someone here in puddletown would actually make boiled bagels, but the uppity white people here would probably turn up their noses after being fed the fiction that the mini bread rolls with a hole are actually bagels.
That's the day here, I got nothing else exciting
[odd autumn colors.jpg]
It's almost midnight and so it's time to launch a new Magic Monday. Ask me anything about occultism, and with certain exceptions noted below, any question received by midnight Monday Eastern time will get an answer. Please note: Any question or comment received after that point will not get an answer, and in fact will not be put through. If you're in a hurry, or suspect you may be the 341,928th person to ask a question, please check out the very rough version 1.3 of The Magic Monday FAQ here.
I've also had quite a few people over the years ask me where they should buy my books, and here's the answer. Bookshop.org is an alternative online bookstore that supports local bookstores and authors, which a certain gargantuan corporation doesn't, and I have a shop there, which you can check out here. Please consider patronizing it if you'd like to purchase any of my books online.I am always worried that one of these pieces that I dash off in the morning while drinking my coffee will drift into the realm of whining. I am overall pretty content with my life and much of the time I am relieved that I managed to avoid (or, being realistic, it avoided me) the curse of success in America.
I suppose that my expectations have never been all that high. When they were at their highest, I was not any more happy than I am today. I really don't own any more than I did when I was living in the dorms at the U. of Utah in the early seventies and I was just about content then just like I am just about content now.
Ambition and expectations change over the years. Much of it is situational and transient. I genuinely wonder how much of the dissatisfaction with "your life" has in it as a source a perceived requirement from a person that you used to be.
For your viewing pleasure (disgust? Kinda depends.) this was last night's dinner, fried bologna sandwich grilled with swiss cheese on homemade bread washed down with a cold Coors. The cup was from tea earlier in the day (you can still see the "clampy thingy"). The little bowl is my incense bowl filled with white sand..
[bologna.jpg]
Just a heads up -- a fortunate conjunction of events will have me in New York City on the weekend of December 19-21. I'll be taking in Mozart's opera The Magic Flute on the evening of the 19th and attending an esoteric lodge meeting on the afternoon of the next day, but I don't have anything scheduled for the evening of Saturday the 20th. If any of my readers would like to get together somewhere in lower Manhattan or points nearby that evening, I'm up for it. Let me know! I suppose on of the things that annoy me about any "serious" post concerning "serious" subjects like finance or weather is that the persons writing the piece treat the graphs like sales tools instead of means to accurately convey information. Simply put, they use the Y-axis to make a sale for their way of thinking by limiting the amount of information conveyed/
Consider this little post over at Twitter (BTW, I refuse to call it X: to understand see this post).
Look carefully at the axes. The 36 month X-axis makes me suspicious in the first place. Why was this period chosen? If we are attempting to place where we are in the decline of the preferred human environment, The first CERES satellite was launched in 1997. I think that a a three year period out the the nearly 30 years of data collection is suspect.
The Y-axis is even more interesting. Again, you have to consider this in relationship to the X-axis, Is the left end of the graph a temporal Maximum and we are working from there. Or has it been a steady decline over the 28 years of data collection? For that matter, what datasets are being actually analyzed?
Look, I am not saying that the data is wrong, but it really seem to me that the data is incomplete and presented in a way to support a claim (read here: Sales) rather than giving the reader a full understanding of long-term climate trends. Three years and 0.65% might be significant, but I cannot make a judgement from the data presented.
I am convinced that climate change has an anthropomorphic element. But unless the people trying to educate start giving complete and accurate information, their current cherry-picking of data and deliberate efforts to frighten will allow the people with different opinions to further undermine decisions.
(Side Note: I cropped the photo below, both X and Y-axis. But I did so to show the goddamn squirrel trying to guilt me out for inadequate peanuts, you don't need my window frame to convey that. It is not dissimilar from that which the "scientist" above did with the data presented but I felt in this case you needed a unnecessary warning)
[Squirrel.jpg]

http://buymeacoffee.com/kimberlysteele
Your prayers of blessing to the deity/deities of your choice are welcome whether or not you can donate.
(“The Holy Polytheistic Catholic Church”)
A thought-experiment in how Roman Catholicism could be re-imagined as an explicitly henotheistic (one supreme deity, many real subordinate gods) and genuinely tolerant polytheistic tradition without abandoning its core identity, liturgy, scripture, or seven sacraments.
“We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible, source of all gods and of all creation…
And in one Lord Jesus Christ… by whom all things were made, both the cosmos and the gods who govern its parts…
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life… We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins… We look for the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come, when every god and goddess shall bow before the throne of the Most High. Amen.”
January 1 Circumcision of the Lord – also ancient feast of Janus
February 5 St. Agatha – also Roman feast of Concordia
March 1 St. David of Wales – local Celtic deities welcomed
June 24 Nativity of St. John the Baptist – paralleled with summer-solstice gods
August 15 Assumption of Mary – understood as the apotheosis of the Theotokos into Queen of All Gods
December 17–23 The old Saturnalia is restored as a nine-day carnival under the patronage of Saturnus and Ops, explicitly permitted by the Church as “the rejoicing of the elder gods who have submitted to Christ.”
“All gods who do not actively war against the Most High or demand human sacrifice may be lawfully worshipped by their peoples. Catholics may participate in civic rites to these gods as acts of courtesy, provided the primacy of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is inwardly preserved. Forced conversion of polytheists is forbidden; the Church grows by persuasion and example, not by the sword.”
In short, this re-imagined Church keeps everything Catholics love—Mass, sacraments, hierarchy, Marian devotion, monasticism—while openly acknowledging the gods that most ancient Catholics quietly believed were still out there anyway. It is Rome’s old genius for syncretism and universality, resurrected for a post-monotheist age.
I'll admit that I find it rather intriguing. I'll leave it to anyone reading this to reach their own conclusions, of course.
So crows are hanging around for the winter which is their normal routine. I will be ordering peanuts for their dining pleasure (the jays are welcome as well, but they are much more obnoxious, especially the pretty-boy steller's). I have been taken to task for feeding them cheap Wal-Mart peanuts in the shell. The bird weirdo's that take umbrage at my feeding them cheap peanuts feel I should purchase for-purpose organic peanuts because the poor birds deserve only the best. They come nearly unglued when I tell them sometimes I feed the birds salted peanuts. These are a huge hit and disappear incredibly fast, the squirrels who share the feast uninvited seem especially taken. I figure if the salt hasn't killed me, it won't kill the boidies.
For the small birds this year, I have decided that they will only get suet blocks. It isn't that I am cheap, but all the different "sparrows" (chickadees, juncos, sparrows, finches, etc) are a bunch of slobs. If I put out seed, most of it seems to end up on the ground beneath the feeder. While I am certain that something eats the fallen seed, I don't really want mice and other rodents taking advantage. It is bad enough with the goddamn squirrels.
[Crow and Tree.jpg]